HaemoW

n November 1636, the prices of tulip bulbs in the Dutch market rose rapidly from their normal level to the point where a single bulb might sell for 10 times the annual earnings of a typical worker. Just as quickly, in May 1637, tulip-bulb prices returned to their previous values. The causes of this dramatic rise and fall remain in dispute. The event occurred during the Dutch Golden Age, when stock exchanges, central banking, and many of the fundamental structures that govern contemporary capital markets and the approaches deployed by MBAs today were developed.
One modern economic analysis suggests that the precipitous decline in tulip-bulb prices resulted from a February 1637 change in the way that futures contracts were enforced, which immediately reduced the value of those contracts by 97%,1 but this analysis doesn't explain why the prices had shot up in the first place. Clearly, tulipmania was a bubble market fueled by speculation rather than intrinsic valuation. After all, why would people be willing to pay 10 times the average annual wage for a single tulip bulb unless they were confident that they could sell it to an even greater fool willing to pay even more?
Bubble markets are created when an asset trades for increasingly higher prices as it is bought by people who are hopeful about its future value and then sold to others with even more optimistic views of that value. Recent examples include the U.S. housing bubble, in which home prices rapidly rose until 2007 and then just as rapidly fell, and the dot-com bubble, in which prices of Internet stocks rose until 2000 and then plummeted. Bubbles burst when some new sense of lower intrinsic value appears. The last buyers are stuck with something they paid too much for and can no longer unload. It's like being caught without a chair when the music stops, but whereas even the losers at musical chairs knew that at some point someone would be left standing, bubble markets are usually recognized only in retrospect — the losers never saw it coming.
Are we in a bubble market in medical education? In medicine, students buy their education from medical schools and residency programs (which pay wages that are lower than the value of the work that residents provide in return). This education is transformed into skills and credentials that are then sold to patients in the form of services. So long as it is believed that patients, or whoever purchases health care on their behalf, will keep paying more and more for physicians' services, students and trainees should be willing to pay more and more for the education that enables them to sell those services.

BACKGROUND
Increased nut consumption has been associated with a reduced risk of major chronic diseases, including cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes mellitus. However, the association between nut consumption and mortality remains unclear.
Full Text of Background...
METHODS
We examined the association between nut consumption and subsequent total and cause-specific mortality among 76,464 women in the Nurses' Health Study (1980–2010) and 42,498 men in the Health Professionals Follow-up Study (1986–2010). Participants with a history of cancer, heart disease, or stroke were excluded. Nut consumption was assessed at baseline and updated every 2 to 4 years.
Full Text of Methods...
RESULTS
During 3,038,853 person-years of follow-up, 16,200 women and 11,229 men died. Nut consumption was inversely associated with total mortality among both women and men, after adjustment for other known or suspected risk factors. The pooled multivariate hazard ratios for death among participants who ate nuts, as compared with those who did not, were 0.93 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.90 to 0.96) for the consumption of nuts less than once per week, 0.89 (95% CI, 0.86 to 0.93) for once per week, 0.87 (95% CI, 0.83 to 0.90) for two to four times per week, 0.85 (95% CI, 0.79 to 0.91) for five or six times per week, and 0.80 (95% CI, 0.73 to 0.86) for seven or more times per week (P<0 .001="" also="" and="" associations="" between="" cancer="" consumption="" deaths="" disease.="" disease="" due="" for="" heart="" inverse="" nut="" observed="" p="" respiratory="" significant="" to="" trend="" were="">Full Text of Results...
CONCLUSIONS
In two large, independent cohorts of nurses and other health professionals, the frequency of nut consumption was inversely associated with total and cause-specific mortality, independently of other predictors of death. (Funded by the National Institutes of Health and the International Tree Nut Council Nutrition Research and Education Foundation.)
Full Text of Discussion...
Read the Full Article...

Auto Read More dengan Thumbnail berfungsi untuk memotong Postingan dan Menampilkan Thumbnail berdasarkan gambar yang ada di Postingan tersebut secara otomatis. Auto Read More dengan Thumbnail bisa dibilang lebih Praktis daripada Read More yang manual karena kita tidak perlu menambahkan Kode di Setiap Postingan. Thumbnail tentunya juga membuat tampilan lebih menarik dan lebih menjelaskan isi dari Postingan tersebut.
Baca  Juga : Cara Membuat Blogger / Blogspot Template SEO Friendly Part 2

Apa hubungan Auto Read More dengan SEO?

Jika Temen - temen Blogger membaca Artikel saya mengenai 7 Cara Mempercepat dan Meringankan Loading Blog. Tentunya temen - temen Blogger sudah tahu apa hubungan Auto Read More dengan SEO, yaitu untuk Mempercepat dan Meringankan Loading Blog. Selain itu Read More juga akan mempermudah untuk melihat Highlight setiap postingan sehingga mereka dapat dengan mudah memilih Postingan mana yang sesuai dengan kebutuhan mereka.
Baca Juga : Cara agar Blog tidak bisa di Copas Part 1

Bagaimana Cara Memasang Auto Read More?

Oke, untuk memasang Auto Read More, Temen - temen Blogger hanya perlu mengikuti langkah - langkah simple berikut ini :
Login ke Blogger dan Langsung menuju ke Dashboard > Template > Edit HTML. (Jangan Lupa untuk Back Up Template terlebih dahulu.)
Cari kode :